Small Story/Content related catch-all for Patch 6 #43
Labels
No Label
bug
Critical Priority
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
High Priority
Low Priority
Medium Priority
Meta
needs more info
question
refactor
wontfix
bug
Critical Priority
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
High Priority
invalid
Low Priority
Medium Priority
Meta
question
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Cavemanon/SnootGame#43
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I have been seeing very small things in the story that could be issues or things that could be done perhaps better. These are things that do not relate to coding, but more to the actual content, but small or different enough that it would be an overkill to produce a separate issue for each.
So I propose for each Patch version, we open an issue to catch these and merge the fixes/enhancements as necessary and as ready to the next release version.
Issues in here are in the script.rpy file, as of Patch 5. (I don't think the modularization of the script.rpy file is in there yet.)
Each reply here, should have a tag or something, perhaps a starting line like [NEW ITEM: blablabla] if it is not a reply to an existing thing.
IF someone intends to reply to an issue pls quote the entire first line at least.
(Sidenote, if this is not the appropriate channel/format for such, please feel free to close it and advise.)
[NEW ITEM: Line 1192 "{i}Ro I am so sorry Stella! Come, I shall nurse you back at my home!{/i}"]
This line
shows up in the conversiation not as Rosa saying it, but instead, the identifier for Ro shows up.
Proposed fix:
[NEW ITEM: Line 20188 "And my present to her still hung around securely on her neck."]
This line
If doing ending 4, just after Christmas, in the bed snuggling with Fang seems to refer to something that is possibly not added until later (silver-amber pendant) or something missed earlier.
Verification needed.
Proposed fix: Replace line with something -- Writer Anons?
[NEW ITEM: Line 12195 ""My life flashes before my life and my first thought is: god my life sucks."]
This line
Is this a reference to something or a typo?
Verification needed. Writer Anons?
[NEW ITEM: Line 28585 "if tradwife:"]
These lines
This is more of a discussion piece, admittedly - and I have no real broad channel to discuss.
In patch3 ending 4 had the marriage ending CGS. It is now only designated to Ending 3, the "tradwife" ending. I have found it a little jarring that it was missing, sure, it is possibly a good thing to make the endings distinct, but it ended the game abruptly, somewhat unsatisfying (in comparison to before). I had someone else from the general player base saying something similar.
Maybe we're just too autistic, but are there plans to have a different ending screen for Ending 4? If so, pls make it wholesome.
Small Story/Content realted catch-all for Patch 6to Small Story/Content related catch-all for Patch 6sending this over to the story nerds.
Aparently this line isn't supposed to exist at all.
probably should say since im working on these fixes, yes this is in the works
fixed what was needed to be fixed. Make a new issue if something else crops up