Cavemanon/SnootGame
24
Fork 18
Code Issues 4 Pull Requests 1 Projects Releases 9 Wiki Activity

Get this shit in the Debian Repos, DUR, or AUR #46

New Issue
Closed
opened 2021-07-01 02:43:54 +00:00 by MichaelYick · 6 comments
MichaelYick commented 2021-07-01 02:43:54 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

For my GNU/Linux friends mostly. It'd be funny to have this thing in the repos, even if they're unoffical repos. Maybe also have something for Scoop (Wangslows package manager) and homebrew (MacOS).

Not really the highest priority, but it something I'd like to see.

For my GNU/Linux friends mostly. It'd be funny to have this thing in the repos, even if they're unoffical repos. Maybe also have something for Scoop (Wangslows package manager) and homebrew (MacOS). Not really the highest priority, but it something I'd like to see.
❤️ 1
MichaelYick added the
enhancement
Low Priority
 labels 2021-07-01 02:43:54 +00:00
MichaelYick added this to the Monster-Update-6 milestone 2021-07-01 05:16:08 +00:00
Nio commented 2021-07-01 10:47:52 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

I'm probably going to be called a pleb, but I use Ubuntu on the regular. Seeing as that is based on Debian, it's likely going to be able to install it as well, once the repo is added (whichever it might end up being).

I'm probably going to be called a pleb, but I use Ubuntu on the regular. Seeing as that is based on Debian, it's likely going to be able to install it as well, once the repo is added (whichever it might end up being).
MichaelYick commented 2021-07-01 15:21:34 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

I'm probably going to be called a pleb
Distro-Warring

Wait, people actually distro-war? I though that was an ironic meme people did in desktop threads when they ran out anime girls to put next to a neofetch.

Seeing as that is based on Debian, it's likely going to be able to install it as well, once the repo is added

We'd have to make a version for stable, testing, and unstable. Ubuntu is based off testing, so that'd be the best option. The Debian User Repository is pretty dead for now, but might be worth packaging there too.

>I'm probably going to be called a pleb >Distro-Warring Wait, people actually distro-war? I though that was an ironic meme people did in desktop threads when they ran out anime girls to put next to a neofetch. >Seeing as that is based on Debian, it's likely going to be able to install it as well, once the repo is added We'd have to make a version for stable, testing, and unstable. Ubuntu is based off testing, so that'd be the best option. The Debian User Repository is pretty dead for now, but might be worth packaging there too.
Nio commented 2021-07-01 16:32:35 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

Wait, people actually distro-war? I though that was an ironic meme people did in desktop threads when they ran out anime girls to put next to a neofetch.

I don't think that's ever going to die out. :D

We'd have to make a version for stable, testing, and unstable. Ubuntu is based off testing, so that'd be the best option. The Debian User Repository is pretty dead for now, but might be worth packaging there too.

Ubuntu is relatively popular, might be worth a shot. Or at the very least making it somewhat distro agnostic (for at least Debian-based distros anyway).

> Wait, people actually distro-war? I though that was an ironic meme people did in desktop threads when they ran out anime girls to put next to a neofetch. I don't think that's ever going to die out. :D > We'd have to make a version for stable, testing, and unstable. Ubuntu is based off testing, so that'd be the best option. The Debian User Repository is pretty dead for now, but might be worth packaging there too. Ubuntu is relatively popular, might be worth a shot. Or at the very least making it somewhat distro agnostic (for at least Debian-based distros anyway).
Nio commented 2021-07-06 09:28:33 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

How do I add a new package to the archive?
Get interested in a package by using or developing it.
Discover that it isn't already available from the Debian archive.
Check if it can be packaged (licence, etc) and if it is already being packaged by someone else (via ITPs on https://bugs.debian.org/wnpp)

Review whether you can reasonably maintain this package. This includes the complexity of the package and your skill level, whether you're familiar with the programming language(s) used, and also whether upstream is active and you can expect reasonable support from them in bug-fixing and helping to handle bugs from Debian users.
File an ITP (intent to package) bug using reportbug (or the bug reporting e-mail address) against the wnpp package. This is done to prevent duplication of work, and is an essential step.

Create the package, getting help from the various resources listed in this FAQ and elsewhere.
Install and test your package thoroughly. Ask on the debian-mentors mailing list for people to check your packaging for errors and common problems.

If you're a DD already, you can just upload your package. Otherwise, upload your package somewhere that prospective sponsors can review it (such as https://mentors.debian.net/), and then find a sponsor to upload the package into the Debian archive for you.

Once you get your package sponsored, please tell the debian-mentors mailing list if you asked for sponsorship there, so that other prospective sponsors don't waste time reviewing your package and getting it ready for upload when it's already been uploaded. That way they can go on and upload someone else's package. This goes for any other places you asked for sponsorship, like other lists, IRC channels, etc -- let everyone know you got a sponsor, so we don't duplicate effort.

This is from : https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#How_do_I_make_my_first_package.3F

What I am thinking, first, we would need to get the game to probably after Update 6. So that it won't be kicked back too much from the Mentors (without malice on any account, I'm sure it will be passed back and forth a few times to do tweaks). Additionally, I think it would be better to have the placeholder images replaced as well (the black and white ones), if it is an option, before filing an intent to package.

As for supporting it, I'd gladly help out with that in the longer term, too.

> How do I add a new package to the archive? Get interested in a package by using or developing it. Discover that it isn't already available from the Debian archive. Check if it can be packaged (licence, etc) and if it is already being packaged by someone else (via ITPs on https://bugs.debian.org/wnpp) > Review whether you can reasonably maintain this package. This includes the complexity of the package and your skill level, whether you're familiar with the programming language(s) used, and also whether upstream is active and you can expect reasonable support from them in bug-fixing and helping to handle bugs from Debian users. File an ITP (intent to package) bug using reportbug (or the bug reporting e-mail address) against the wnpp package. This is done to prevent duplication of work, and is an essential step. > Create the package, getting help from the various resources listed in this FAQ and elsewhere. Install and test your package thoroughly. Ask on the debian-mentors mailing list for people to check your packaging for errors and common problems. > If you're a DD already, you can just upload your package. Otherwise, upload your package somewhere that prospective sponsors can review it (such as https://mentors.debian.net/), and then find a sponsor to upload the package into the Debian archive for you. > Once you get your package sponsored, please tell the debian-mentors mailing list if you asked for sponsorship there, so that other prospective sponsors don't waste time reviewing your package and getting it ready for upload when it's already been uploaded. That way they can go on and upload someone else's package. This goes for any other places you asked for sponsorship, like other lists, IRC channels, etc -- let everyone know you got a sponsor, so we don't duplicate effort. This is from : https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#How_do_I_make_my_first_package.3F What I am thinking, first, we would need to get the game to probably after Update 6. So that it won't be kicked back too much from the Mentors (without malice on any account, I'm sure it will be passed back and forth a few times to do tweaks). Additionally, I think it would be better to have the placeholder images replaced as well (the black and white ones), if it is an option, before filing an intent to package. As for supporting it, I'd gladly help out with that in the longer term, too.
MichaelYick commented 2021-07-06 13:14:29 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

neat, got my greenlight for a deb package once everything is done

neat, got my greenlight for a deb package once everything is done
nutbuster removed this from the Monster-Update-6 milestone 2021-10-17 08:56:28 +00:00
MichaelYick commented 2022-07-06 15:39:45 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

Some madlad did it
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/snoot-game-bin

Some madlad did it https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/snoot-game-bin
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something is not working
Critical Priority
Absolutely urgent issues that must be delt with before others can even be considered.
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement
New feature
help wanted
Need some help
High Priority
Bugs that cause crashes, major story errors, or other massively negative issues. Features that are a must-have inclusion or else the game won't be as good.
Low Priority
Minor or easy to miss errors. Features that'd be nice, but can be done with out.
Medium Priority
Errors that stick out, but aren't fatal to gameplay. Features that are in decent demand or would improve gameplay by a signifigant amount
Meta
for all the other fun stuff about the project thats not code
needs more info
Something is wrong
question
refactor
Cleaning up the cruft
wontfix
This won't be fixed
bug
Something is not working
Critical Priority
Absolutely urgent issues that must be delt with before others can even be considered.
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement
New feature
help wanted
Need some help
High Priority
Bugs that cause crashes, major story errors, or other massively negative issues. Features that are a must-have inclusion or else the game won't be as good.
invalid
Something is wrong
Low Priority
Minor or easy to miss errors. Features that'd be nice, but can be done with out.
Medium Priority
Errors that stick out, but aren't fatal to gameplay. Features that are in decent demand or would improve gameplay by a signifigant amount
Meta
for all the other fun stuff about the project thats not code
question
More information is needed
wontfix
This won't be fixed
No Label
enhancement
Low Priority
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
Cereal Jingo Jluminate Legalo Map MapAnon MichaelYick Mod Nerd Nio nutbuster ReleaseSmith Sl1 TheNerd writerdev
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Cavemanon/SnootGame#46
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?